|
Student Information | Publications | Employment Opportunities / Classified Ads | ACSM/NSPS |
![]() |
|
INFORMATION ON Links:
http://www.acsm.net
•
http://www.nspsmo.org
|
|
|
|
May 2010 ACSM Government Affairs Update
IN THIS ISSUE …
1.
JGAC Meeting Recap
2.
Lobby Day 2010 Webinar
3.
COFPAES Delegate Meeting
4.
Fundraiser Report
5.
FEMA News
6.
Federal Register Notice – “Inherently Governmental”
Function
________________________________________________________________________
JGAC Meeting Recap
--- The Joint Government Affairs Committee recently held
its meeting in Phoenix. As always, the meeting was well
attended and there was a great discussion on a number of
topics important to the surveying and mapping community.
The full JGAC Report will be posted on the ACSM website.
Lobby Day 2010 Webinar --- VERY IMPORTANT ---
Since our Fall meeting will take place in Orlando, we
will not be having a traditional Lobby Day in
Washington. Instead, we are asking you to visit your
Member of Congress in their home district offices during
the Summer Recess, which will be from August 9 to
September 9, 2010. Please make your own appointments to
fit your schedule with your Representative and Senator.
We will provide you with an electronic version of the
materials to take to your meetings.
Also, mark your calendars for our Lobby Day Webinar,
which will take place on Tuesday, June 22 at 11:00
a.m. eastern standard time. During the webinar,
we will go over the issues and answer any of your
questions. Watch your e-mail for details about this
exciting event.
COFPAES Delegate Meeting ---
COFPAES recently held its Delegates Meeting in
Washington, DC. During the morning session, we heard
from several prominent speakers from the Federal
government. Daniel Gordon, Administrator of the Office
of Federal Procurement Policy held a roundtable
discussion on procurement issues important to the A/E
community. Elizabeth Wilkins, Policy Assistant for Urban
Affairs and Mobility and Opportunity in the White House
discussed the role of the White House Office of
Sustainable Communities and COFPAES’ proposed Livable
Communities Act. H. Glen Walker, Executive Director of
the Recovery Accountability and Transparency Board spoke
about the Stimulus funds and how the various agencies
are using the federal funding.
During our Delegate meeting, we discussed a number of
issues. One of those involved SBA Size Standards. The
SBA will review its size standard in the A/E field in
2010. Currently, the SBA Size Standard for surveying is
$4.5 million gross. We will monitor this issue as it
moves forward. Another issue discussed was the continued
placement of A/E services on the GSA Schedule. Member
organizations will review the current GSA Schedules for
areas that violate the Brooks Act and COFPAES will meet
with GSA to address our concerns. The third issue
involved the recent Federal Register Notice relating to
the definition of “inherently governmental” function.
There are two main areas of the Notice that give us
concern; the first is OFPP’s suggested limits on
contracting of “professional and technical services” and
the second relates to the construction of “buildings or
structures intended to be secure from eavesdropping or
other penetration by foreign governments.” Both of these
issues are addressed by comments submitted by both
COFPAES and ACSM.
Fundraiser Report ---
The Political Action Committee (PAC) contributed to
several fundraisers recently. Here are the reports from
those fundraisers:
FEMA News ---
FEMA recently released a report entitled “Housing Units
in One-Pecent Annual Chance Floodplain Impacts of FEMA’s
Flood Map Modernzation Program.” In order to provide an
estimate for the number of housing units “mapped in” the
one-percent annual chance (1%) floodplain over the last
few years, an analysis using Geographic Information
Systems (GIS) was performed in January 2010. To provide
a comparison of the flood zones mapped during Flood Map
Modernization (Map Mod), new Digital Flood Insurance
Rate Map (DFIRM) floodplain boundaries (studies
contracted as of 2004 and effective as of April 2009)
were acquired from the National Flood Hazard Layer
(NFHL) and calculations regarding the areal extent of
each flood zone were calculated. A total of 798 counties
in the Unites States and territories were deemed as
having sufficient NFHL flood zone coverage to include in
this analysis.
Because FEMA prioritized high-risk high-population (not
large geographic) areas in Map Mod, the 798 counties
used in this analysis showed a change in the special
flood hazard area (SFHA), or 1% annual chance
floodplain, from 56,700 square miles prior to Map Mod to
60,500 mapped square miles as of April 2009. It is
estimated that the current SFHA nationwide (including
Alaska, Hawaii, American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana
Islands, Puerto Rico and Virgin Islands) is on the order
of 243,500 square miles, whereas the total land area of
the Nation is almost 3,600,000 square miles.
The following conclusions were reached based on this
analysis:
• As of the close of Fiscal Year 2009 (FY09), FEMA has
issued modernized Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) in
preliminary format for over 80% of the Nation’s
population, in about 16,000 communities
• Of those maps, maps for 58% of the Nation’s population
have been finalized, in about 9,000 communities
• Among those FIRMs, the overall size of the Special
Flood Hazard Area has increased by about 7%, based on
FEMA mapping completed by April 2009
• The estimated number of people in the SFHA was reduced
from 10.2 million prior to Map Mod to 10.0 million post
Map Mod in the 798 counties analyzed.
• The estimated number of housing units in the SFHA went
from 4.44 million prior to Map Mod down to 4.35 million
housing units post Map Mod in the 798 counties analyzed.
By the end of this fiscal year, FEMA expects to have
preliminary Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRM) issued for
over 92% of the Nation’s population. FEMA noted that it
will continue to ensure, as draft maps are released,
that it will provide ample opportunity for the public to
comment on the maps before they are finalized.
Federal Register Notice – “Inherently Governmental”
Function
--- ACSM recently filed comments to the Federal Register
Notice relating to OFPP’s review of the definition of
“inherently governmental” function.
In our comments, we noted that ACSM is very much
concerned with several points in the Proposed OFPP
Policy Letter as it relates to the discussion of
“inherently governmental” function. The Federal
Activities Inventory Reform (FAIR) Act (P.L. 105-270)
defines “inherently governmental” function as an
activity that is “so intimately related to the public
interest as to mandate performance by Federal
employees.” This definition is somewhat vague and
ambiguous because it does not define what “intimately
related” is and who makes that determination.
Another concern that ACSM has can be found at page 16191
of the Notice. The language states, in part, “For
ongoing contracts, agencies should review how work is
performed, focusing, in particular, on functions that
are closely associated with inherently governmental
activities and professional and technical services,
(emphasis added) to ensure the scope of the work or the
circumstances have not changed to the point that
inherently governmental authority has been transferred
to the contractor.” Surveyors receive extensive
education and go through a testing and licensing
procedure in their state to ensure they have the highest
degree of technical expertise. As a provider of
“professional and technical services” they should not be
subject to a higher degree of scrutiny over their work
product than any other government contractor.
Additionally, surveying professionals are already
subject to the qualifications based selection (QBS)
process, as required by the Brooks Act (40 U.S.C. 1101,
et. seq.) which requires that their qualifications be
examined prior to selection for federal contract work.
ACSM is also concerned about the discussion of
“Construction of buildings or structures intended to be
secure from electronic eavesdropping or other
penetration by foreign governments” under the
“illustrative list … of functions that are closely
associated with the performance of inherently
governmental functions.”
This language could result in the design and
construction of all Federal buildings and
structures being deemed closely associated with the
performance of inherently governmental functions and a
gray area with regard to whether such design and
construction could be performed by contract to the
private sector.
The comments were due on June 1, 2010. |
|
American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, 6 Montgomery
Village Avenue, Ste 403, Gaithersburg, MD 20879 |
|